Evidence an auditor can cite - not a screenshot they have to trust.
Every finding ties to a MASVS control and the MASTG test that verified it, then rolls up to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR and KVKK. The result is a signed, exportable evidence bundle: the technical proof an assessment needs, mapped to the frameworks your stakeholders already speak.
Defensible proof, traceable from control to test
Signed evidence bundles
A fixed, exportable record per release that an assessor can reference directly, not a moment-in-time screenshot.
Control-to-test traceability
Every finding links the MASVS requirement to the MASTG procedure that checked it - the chain an auditor asks for.
Framework roll-up
One technical result mapped to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR and KVKK, so each reviewer sees their own language.
Decision history
Risk acceptance, false-positive calls and remediation are recorded with who decided and why - the audit trail comes built in.
Proof of remediation
A re-scan of the fixed build shows the issue is genuinely gone, so the bundle demonstrates closure, not just a status change.
Per-tenant reporting
Branded, scoped reports per organisation, so the right evidence reaches the right reviewer and no one else.
An honest line we will not cross
References describe how the platform maps to these open standards. They do not imply certification, partnership or endorsement by any standards body. What you get is rigorous, traceable technical evidence - the part of compliance that is ours to provide, stated plainly.
For the people who answer the auditor
Does a clean report mean we are certified or compliant?
No - and we will never imply it does. Mobexa produces the technical evidence and the traceability an assessment relies on, and shows how your apps map to open standards. Certification itself is granted by accredited bodies, not by a testing platform. We give you the defensible technical half of the picture.
What is actually in an evidence bundle?
The findings for a given release, each tied to the MASVS control it concerns and the MASTG technique used to verify it, with redacted proof, severity and the decision history. It is signed and exportable, so an auditor can cite a specific, fixed point in time rather than trusting a screenshot.
How do findings connect to the frameworks our auditors use?
MASVS is the technical spine. From there, results roll up to the relevant clauses of NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR and KVKK, so the same test answers an engineering question and a control question at once. You can view posture through whichever framework a given stakeholder speaks.
Can we prove a finding was remediated, not just closed?
Yes. A re-scan of the fixed build produces fresh evidence that the issue is gone, and the finding's history shows the transition with who verified it. The bundle therefore demonstrates remediation, not just a status change in a tracker.
Turn a release into evidence your assessor can cite.
We will scan one of your apps and return a sample evidence bundle - findings, MASVS/MASTG mapping and framework roll-up.