See your iOS app the way an attacker does.
Mobexa tests the exact IPA you ship - binary, embedded provisioning profile, Info.plist, entitlements and bundled frameworks - then runs it on instrumented devices. No source, no jailbreak fleet to maintain, MASVS-mapped findings and SARIF for your pipeline.
Static and dynamic on the same IPA
Hand Mobexa the build your pipeline already signs. It reads the package an attacker reads, then proves behaviour at runtime.
Static (SAST)
Binary, Info.plist, entitlements, provisioning profile and bundled frameworks - parsed for the exposures an attacker reads first.
Dynamic (DAST)
Your build runs on an instrumented device. Mobexa records network behaviour, on-device storage and whether ATS and pinning actually hold.
SBOM + supply chain
Every embedded framework and SDK inventoried and matched to known CVEs - the third-party risk inside your binary.
The exposures that actually hurt iOS apps
iOS exposure hides in configuration as much as code - an ATS exception, an over-broad entitlement, a keychain item with the wrong protection class. Mobexa reads the binary and every plist around it, then confirms the risk on a real device.
- App Transport Security exceptions and cleartext allowances.
- Entitlement and capability over-grants beyond what the app needs.
- Keychain and data-protection classes that leave data readable.
- Secrets in the binary and plists confirmed by structure.
- Weak crypto and insecure storage proven at runtime.
Audit-ready by default
Each finding carries its rule, location, evidence snippet, severity and MASVS control. Findings export as SARIF for code-scanning dashboards and roll up to NIST SSDF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, GDPR and KVKK, so the same result satisfies engineering, security and audit.
iOS testing, answered plainly
Can you test an iOS app without our source or a jailbroken device?
Yes. Mobexa analyses the IPA your pipeline produces - the binary, embedded provisioning profile, Info.plist, entitlements and bundled frameworks - the same material available to an attacker who pulls the app. Dynamic testing runs on instrumented devices we manage, so you do not maintain a jailbreak fleet.
What iOS-specific issues does it check?
App Transport Security exceptions and cleartext allowances, entitlement and capability over-grants, insecure keychain and data-protection classes, plaintext local storage, weak or misused cryptography, exposed secrets in the binary and plists, and risky bundled SDKs - each mapped to an OWASP MASVS control.
How does iOS coverage compare to Android?
The platform is the same engine with platform-aware checks. iOS adds plist, entitlement, provisioning-profile and ATS analysis; Android adds manifest, exported-component and DEX analysis. Findings for both land in one deduplicated, MASVS-mapped backlog so a mixed estate reads as one risk picture.
Does it produce evidence our auditors will accept?
Every finding carries its rule, location, evidence and MASVS mapping, exports as SARIF, and rolls up to NIST SSDF, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, GDPR and KVKK - the technical proof a review and an audit both need.
Send us an IPA and see the findings.
We will run your iOS build through static, dynamic and supply-chain analysis and walk you through the evidence.