Findings your engineers trust, mapped to standards your auditors accept.
Every result Mobexa produces is anchored to an OWASP MASVS control and the MASTG test that verifies it, then rolled up to the frameworks a board and a regulator already understand. One scan speaks two languages at once - the technical one your team fixes against, and the compliance one your auditor signs off.
The security domains every finding is filed under
OWASP MASVS organises mobile security into clear domains. Mobexa's static, dynamic and runtime results all land in this structure, so coverage is legible at a glance instead of buried in a list.
| MASVS domain | What it covers | How Mobexa tests it |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | How sensitive data is kept on the device | Static + runtime capture of writes |
| Crypto | Correct use of cryptographic primitives | Instrumented call inspection |
| Auth | Authentication and session handling | Static + dynamic behaviour |
| Network | Transport security and pinning | Runtime traffic + bypass testing |
| Platform | Use of platform APIs and IPC | Manifest + component analysis |
| Code | Code quality and build hardening | Static analysis of the artifact |
| Resilience | Anti-tamper and reverse-engineering defenses | Instrumented defense challenge |
One technical test, six audit conversations covered
MASVS is the spine. These are the frameworks your stakeholders actually cite - and Mobexa connects your findings to each, so the evidence is ready before the question is asked.
NIST
Mobile-relevant controls supported with concrete technical evidence rather than attestation alone.
ISO 27001
Findings that feed the technical control evidence an information-security management system expects.
PCI-DSS
For apps that touch cardholder data, the mobile-side evidence a payments assessment needs.
HIPAA
Technical safeguards for health apps handling protected information, surfaced as testable findings.
GDPR
Data-handling and storage findings that map to the protection obligations a DPO has to defend.
KVKK
The Turkish data-protection framework, mapped alongside GDPR for teams operating in both regimes.
Mapping, not a certificate
References describe how the platform maps to these open standards. They do not imply certification, partnership or endorsement. What Mobexa gives you is the technical evidence and the traceability an accredited assessment relies on - the honest, useful half of the compliance equation.
Framework coverage, answered plainly
What is the difference between MASVS and MASTG?
MASVS is the standard - the set of security requirements a mobile app should meet. MASTG is the testing guide - the procedures used to verify them. Mobexa maps each finding to the MASVS control it concerns and the MASTG technique used to test it, so a result is traceable from "what" to "how it was checked".
How do MASVS controls connect to standards like ISO 27001 or PCI-DSS?
MASVS is the technical spine; the broader frameworks are the language your auditors and regulators speak. Mobexa rolls MASVS-mapped findings up to the relevant clauses of NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, GDPR and KVKK, so the same test produces both engineering detail and compliance evidence.
Does a clean Mobexa report mean we are certified or compliant?
No - and any vendor who claims otherwise is selling you a problem. Mobexa shows how your app maps to these open standards and provides the technical evidence a certification process needs. Certification itself is granted by accredited bodies, not by a scanner.
Can we filter findings by a specific framework?
Yes. Because every finding carries its standards mapping, you can view your posture through the lens that matters to a given stakeholder - a MASVS category for engineering, a PCI requirement for a payments review, a GDPR or KVKK article for a data-protection officer.
Get a report your engineers and your auditors both read without translation.
We will scan one of your apps and return findings mapped to MASVS, MASTG and the compliance frameworks you answer to.